SUBMISSION GUIDE FOR
SUBMISSION GUIDE FOR
JUDGING CRITERIA
The following criteria have been compiled to guide the judging / grading of project submissions through a Hackathon using tracks/themes only (instead of a specific problem statement). These criteria are designed to cater to Hackathons that also involve an audio/video pitch of the solution.
Swipe to see the 7 key criterias.
INNOVATION
10%
How new and innovative is the idea?
This section evaluates the extent to which the solution is new or previously unseen, providing new capabilities or uses that weren’t part of the ecosystem before.
GUIDING
QUESTIONSDoes the team’s project align to the hackathon tracks?
How innovative is the solution? Does this exist cross-chain?
Has this idea been seen before in the IOTA ecosystem?
Does the solution extend or establish new capabilities for IOTA?
Rubrics
1-3 Points
Copy of existing idea, no alignment.4-7 Points
Adds new features, somewhat aligned.8-10 Points
Original and ecosystem-extending solution.INTEGRATION
15%
How well does the solution integrate with IOTA and its ecosystem?
Measures the degree to which the solution integrates with IOTA’s network or ecosystem. How significant is IOTA in underpinning the solution?
GUIDING
QUESTIONSTo what degree does the project use IOTA’s network services?
How integrated is it? What services are used?
Are any ecosystem platforms being leveraged?
Is a service being integrated in a new, creative way?
RUBRICS
1-3 Points
Light or surface-level integration.4-7 Points
Good integration with IOTA services.8-10 Points
Deep and creative use of IOTA tech.FEASIBILITY
10%
How feasible is the idea, both technically and as a business?
Evaluates the practicality of creating the solution using IOTA services and the viability as a sustainable business.
GUIDING
QUESTIONSCan the solution be created using IOTA’s network services or ecosystem platforms?
Is the solution viable in the Web3 context? Could it be implemented using Web2 technologies?
Does the team understand the problem space and have the capability to execute?
Did the team create and understand a Lean / Business Model Canvas?
RUBRICS
1-3 Points
Unrealistic, no model or execution plan.
4-7 Points
Partially feasible, limited execution plan.
8-10 Points
Feasible with strong model and execution plan.
VALIDATION
15%
How well is the solution validated by the market or users?
Evaluates how well the project has been validated through market feedback, customer engagement, or other external validation.
GUIDING
QUESTIONSHas the team engaged external users or customers for feedback?
What traction with the market has been achieved? (e.g., early adopters, trials, revenue)
How positive is the market sentiment?
RUBRICS
1-3 Points
No external validation or traction.4-7 Points
Some feedback and limited traction.8-10 Points
Multiple feedback loops, strong traction.EXECUTION
20%
How well did the team develop and implement the solution?
Evaluates how well the team developed the solution, including the MVP or PoC and how they functioned as a team.
GUIDING
QUESTIONSDid the team deliver an MVP or PoC?
How well did the team work together, and was there effective leadership?
Was there a clear strategy for future product development?
Did the team establish a Go-To-Market (GTM) strategy and identify market feedback cycles?
RUBRICS
1-3 Points
Basic MVP, poor UX, weak teamwork.
4-7 Points
Functional PoC, some planning and teamwork.
8-10 Points
Strong delivery, UX, leadership, and roadmap.
SUCCESS
25%
How does the solution impact IOTA’s success metrics (e.g., accounts, active accounts, TPS)?
Measures the impact the solution has on IOTA’s growth and success metrics such as account creation, active accounts, TPS, and exposure.
GUIDING
QUESTIONSHow does the solution impact IOTA’s success metrics (e.g., accounts, active accounts)?
Has the solution led to greater exposure or adoption for IOTA?
Does it drive more TPS on IOTA?
RUBRICS
1-3 Points
No measurable impact on IOTA.
4-7 Points
Minor impact on growth or usage.
8-10 Points
Strong contribution to IOTA adoption.
PITCH
5%
How well is the idea presented and sold by the team in their pitch?
This section evaluates how well the team presents and sells the solution.
GUIDING
QUESTIONSWas the problem and solution clearly articulated?
Was the pitch engaging and well-structured?
Did the team present a clear opportunity for growth and traction?
Were the metrics and future plans well thought out?
RUBRICS
1-3 Points
Unclear or poorly delivered pitch.
4-7 Points
Clear but average presentation.
8-10 Points
Strong, engaging, and convincing pitch.
Swipe to see the 7 key criterias.
INNOVATION
10%
How new and innovative is the idea?
This section evaluates the extent to which the solution is new or previously unseen, providing new capabilities or uses that weren’t part of the ecosystem before.
GUIDING
QUESTIONSDoes the team’s project align to the hackathon tracks?
How innovative is the solution? Does this exist cross-chain?
Has this idea been seen before in the IOTA ecosystem?
Does the solution extend or establish new capabilities for IOTA?
Rubrics
1-3 Points
Copy of existing idea, no alignment.4-7 Points
Adds new features, somewhat aligned.8-10 Points
Original and ecosystem-extending solution.INTEGRATION
15%
How well does the solution integrate with IOTA and its ecosystem?
Measures the degree to which the solution integrates with IOTA’s network or ecosystem. How significant is IOTA in underpinning the solution?
GUIDING
QUESTIONSTo what degree does the project use IOTA’s network services?
How integrated is it? What services are used?
Are any ecosystem platforms being leveraged?
Is a service being integrated in a new, creative way?
RUBRICS
1-3 Points
Light or surface-level integration.4-7 Points
Good integration with IOTA services.8-10 Points
Deep and creative use of IOTA tech.FEASIBILITY
10%
How feasible is the idea, both technically and as a business?
Evaluates the practicality of creating the solution using IOTA services and the viability as a sustainable business.
GUIDING
QUESTIONSCan the solution be created using IOTA’s network services or ecosystem platforms?
Is the solution viable in the Web3 context? Could it be implemented using Web2 technologies?
Does the team understand the problem space and have the capability to execute?
Did the team create and understand a Lean / Business Model Canvas?
RUBRICS
1-3 Points
Unrealistic, no model or execution plan.
4-7 Points
Partially feasible, limited execution plan.
8-10 Points
Feasible with strong model and execution plan.
VALIDATION
15%
How well is the solution validated by the market or users?
Evaluates how well the project has been validated through market feedback, customer engagement, or other external validation.
GUIDING
QUESTIONSHas the team engaged external users or customers for feedback?
What traction with the market has been achieved? (e.g., early adopters, trials, revenue)
How positive is the market sentiment?
RUBRICS
1-3 Points
No external validation or traction.4-7 Points
Some feedback and limited traction.8-10 Points
Multiple feedback loops, strong traction.EXECUTION
20%
How well did the team develop and implement the solution?
Evaluates how well the team developed the solution, including the MVP or PoC and how they functioned as a team.
GUIDING
QUESTIONSDid the team deliver an MVP or PoC?
How well did the team work together, and was there effective leadership?
Was there a clear strategy for future product development?
Did the team establish a Go-To-Market (GTM) strategy and identify market feedback cycles?
RUBRICS
1-3 Points
Basic MVP, poor UX, weak teamwork.
4-7 Points
Functional PoC, some planning and teamwork.
8-10 Points
Strong delivery, UX, leadership, and roadmap.
SUCCESS
25%
How does the solution impact IOTA’s success metrics (e.g., accounts, active accounts, TPS)?
Measures the impact the solution has on IOTA’s growth and success metrics such as account creation, active accounts, TPS, and exposure.
GUIDING
QUESTIONSHow does the solution impact IOTA’s success metrics (e.g., accounts, active accounts)?
Has the solution led to greater exposure or adoption for IOTA?
Does it drive more TPS on IOTA?
RUBRICS
1-3 Points
No measurable impact on IOTA.
4-7 Points
Minor impact on growth or usage.
8-10 Points
Strong contribution to IOTA adoption.
PITCH
5%
How well is the idea presented and sold by the team in their pitch?
This section evaluates how well the team presents and sells the solution.
GUIDING
QUESTIONSWas the problem and solution clearly articulated?
Was the pitch engaging and well-structured?
Did the team present a clear opportunity for growth and traction?
Were the metrics and future plans well thought out?
RUBRICS
1-3 Points
Unclear or poorly delivered pitch.
4-7 Points
Clear but average presentation.
8-10 Points
Strong, engaging, and convincing pitch.
Each project will be graded on a scale of 1 to 10 for each section, using the descriptors and rubrics outlined. The final score will be calculated as a weighted percentage:
FINAL GRADE
=
SUM OF
WEIGHTED
SCORES
÷
TOTAL
SCORE
x
100%
SUBMISSION ARTEFACTS
Each team should appoint 1 person as the ‘Team Representative’ to submit your project onto the submission portal below before 11:59PM GMT+8, 4 May 2025, Sunday.
1
Project’s GitHub Repository Link
1
Project’s GitHub Repository Link
2
Project Details
2
Project Details
3
Pitch Deck
(in PDF)
3
Pitch Deck
(in PDF)
4
Project Demo Link
4
Project Demo Link
JUDGING CRITERIA
The following criteria have been compiled to guide the judging / grading of project submissions through a Hackathon using tracks/themes only (instead of a specific problem statement). These criteria are designed to cater to Hackathons that also involve an audio/video pitch of the solution.
SUBMISSION GUIDE FOR
JUDGING CRITERIA
The following criteria have been compiled to guide the judging/grading of project submissions through a Hackathon using tracks/themes only (instead of a specific problem statement). These criteria are designed to cater to Hackathons that also involve an audio/video pitch of the solution.
INNOVATION
10%
INTEGRATION
15%
FEASIBILITY
10%
VALIDATION
15%
EXECUTION
20%
SUCCESS
25%
PITCH
5%
How new and innovative is the idea?
This section evaluates the extent to which the solution is new or previously unseen, providing new capabilities or uses that weren’t part of the ecosystem before.
GUIDING QUESTIONS
Does the team’s project align to the hackathon tracks?
How innovative is the solution? Does this exist cross-chain?
Has this idea been seen before in the IOTA ecosystem?
Does the solution extend or establish new capabilities for IOTA?
1-3
POINTS
Solution essentially copies an existing IOTA platform or ecosystem idea, or is a cross-chain migration. Solution does not align with the hackathon tracks.
4-7
POINTS
Solution delivers new capabilities into the IOTA ecosystem. It may be a cross-chain project and aligns with at least one hackathon track.
8-10
POINTS
Solution introduces a new, previously unseen idea, extending or creating new capabilities within the IOTA ecosystem. It aligns well with one or more hackathon tracks.
Each project will be graded on a scale of 1 to 10 for each section, using the descriptors and rubrics outlined. The final score will be calculated as a weighted percentage:
FINAL
GRADE
=
SUM OF WEIGHTED SCORES
TOTAL SCORE
X
100%
INNOVATION
10%
INTEGRATION
15%
FEASIBILITY
10%
VALIDATION
15%
EXECUTION
20%
SUCCESS
25%
PITCH
5%
How new and innovative is the idea?
This section evaluates the extent to which the solution is new or previously unseen, providing new capabilities or uses that weren’t part of the ecosystem before.
GUIDING QUESTIONS
Does the team’s project align to the hackathon tracks?
How innovative is the solution? Does this exist cross-chain?
Has this idea been seen before in the IOTA ecosystem?
Does the solution extend or establish new capabilities for IOTA?
1-3
POINTS
Solution essentially copies an existing IOTA platform or ecosystem idea, or is a cross-chain migration. Solution does not align with the hackathon tracks.
4-7
POINTS
Solution delivers new capabilities into the IOTA ecosystem. It may be a cross-chain project and aligns with at least one hackathon track.
8-10
POINTS
Solution introduces a new, previously unseen idea, extending or creating new capabilities within the IOTA ecosystem. It aligns well with one or more hackathon tracks.
Each project will be graded on a scale of 1 to 10 for each section, using the descriptors and rubrics outlined. The final score will be calculated as a weighted percentage:
FINAL
GRADE
=
SUM OF WEIGHTED SCORES
TOTAL SCORE
X
100%
SUBMISSION ARTEFACTS
Each team should appoint 1 person as the ‘Team Representative’ to submit your project onto the submission portal below before 11:59PM GMT+8, 4 May 2025, Sunday.
1
Project’s GitHub Repository Link
Team leader to create the project's GitHub Repo and share the access with the rest of the team to collaborate on. Click to know more!
1
Project’s GitHub Repository Link
Team leader to create the project's GitHub Repo and share the access with the rest of the team to collaborate on. Click to know more!
2
Project Details
Here are the list of items that needs to be included! Click to know more and don’t miss them out!
2
Project Details
Here are the list of items that needs to be included! Click to know more and don’t miss them out!
3
Pitch Deck (in PDF)
Here’s a potential structure you can adapt for your pitch deck!
3
Pitch Deck (in PDF)
Here’s a potential structure you can adapt for your pitch deck!
4
Project Demo Link
Include the URL to the live working environment of the solution the team has developed.
4
Project Demo Link
Include the URL to the live working environment of the solution the team has developed.
INNOVATION
10%
INTEGRATION
15%
FEASIBILITY
10%
VALIDATION
15%
EXECUTION
20%
SUCCESS
25%
PITCH
5%
How new and innovative is the idea?
This section evaluates the extent to which the solution is new or previously unseen, providing new capabilities or uses that weren’t part of the ecosystem before.
GUIDING
QUESTIONS
Does the team’s project align to the hackathon tracks?
How innovative is the solution? Does this exist cross-chain?
Has this idea been seen before in the IOTA ecosystem?
Does the solution extend or establish new capabilities for IOTA?
1-3 POINTS
Solution essentially copies an existing IOTA platform or ecosystem idea, or is a cross-chain migration. Solution does not align with the hackathon tracks.
4-7 POINTS
Solution delivers new capabilities into the IOTA ecosystem. It may be a cross-chain project and aligns with at least one hackathon track.
8-10 POINTS
Solution introduces a new, previously unseen idea, extending or creating new capabilities within the IOTA ecosystem. It aligns well with one or more hackathon tracks.
Each project will be graded on a scale of 1 to 10 for each section, using the descriptors and rubrics outlined. The final score will be calculated as a weighted percentage:
FINAL GRADE
=
SUM OF WEIGHTED SCORES
TOTAL SCORE
X
100%
SUBMISSION ARTEFACTS
Each team should appoint 1 person as the ‘Team Representative’ to submit your project onto the submission portal below before 11:59PM GMT+8, 4 May 2025, Sunday.
1
Project’s GitHub Repository Link
Team leader to create the project's GitHub Repo and share the access with the rest of the team to collaborate on. Click to know more!
2
Project Details
Here are the list of items that needs to be included! Click to know more and don’t miss them out!
3
Pitch Deck (in PDF)
Here’s a potential structure you can adapt for your pitch deck!
4
Project Demo Link
Include the URL to the live working environment of the solution the team has developed.
ORGANISED BY
POWERED BY
ORGANISED BY
POWERED BY
ORGANISED BY
POWERED BY